Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
3.30 GHz
Direct Media Interface:
8 GT/s
L2 Cache:
512 KB
L3 Cache:
4 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
4
Processor Socket:
Socket H4 LGA-1151
Display & Graphics Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
UHD Graphics 630
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Thermal Design Power:
35 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Thermal Specification:
190.4°F (88°C)
Dimensions Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Pentium Gold CM8068403377714
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
AMD Phenom II X4 Deneb 905e (AM3, L3 6144Kb)
Socket: AM3; Kernel: Deneb; Number of cores: 4; Celeron: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2500 MHz; System bus: HT; A multiplication factor: 12.5; The voltage on the kernel: 0.825 B; Integrated memory controll...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.