Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Hexa-core (6 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.40 GHz
Overclocking Speed:
4 GHz
L3 Cache:
12 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
12
Processor Socket:
Socket LGA-1200
Processor Generation:
10th Gen
Display & Graphics Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
UHD Graphics 630
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Thermal Design Power:
35 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Thermal Specification:
212°F (100°C)
Dimensions Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core i5 CM8070104290410
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
AMD Phenom II X4 Deneb 905e (AM3, L3 6144Kb)
Socket: AM3; Kernel: Deneb; Number of cores: 4; Celeron: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2500 MHz; System bus: HT; A multiplication factor: 12.5; The voltage on the kernel: 0.825 B; Integrated memory controll...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.