Mobiles     Laptops     Tablets     Computers     Hardware  Components       Electronics

Intel Xeon UP 3000 BX805573065 specs.

  CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Xeon UP 3000 BX805573065

Specifications | Reviews


Technical Information Intel Xeon UP 3000 BX805573065
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.33 GHz
Bus Speed:
1333 MHz
L2 Cache:
4 MB
Process Technology:
65 nm
Processor Socket:
Socket T LGA-775


Reviews, Questions about Intel Xeon UP 3000 BX805573065




Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Xeon UP 3000 BX805573065
 
  
      10+6= *


Popular today


Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: OSA8220CRWOF; Brand Name: AMD; Product Line: Opteron; Product Model: 8220; Packaged Quantity: 1; Processor Manufacturer: AMD; Processor Core: Dual-core (2 Core); Clock Speed:...




news
 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 will be the company's first chip with a frequency above 4 GHz.

New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.



news
 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9000 processors turned out to be very powerful and very expensive

AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.



news
 Mobile Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX proved to be faster than its desktop counterpart

The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.