Mobiles     Laptops     Tablets     Computers     Hardware  Components       Electronics

Intel Xeon MP BX80560KF2660F specs.

  CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Xeon MP BX80560KF2660F

Specifications | Reviews


Technical Information Intel Xeon MP BX80560KF2660F
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.66 GHz
Bus Speed:
667 MHz
L2 Cache:
2 MB
Process Technology:
90 nm
Processor Socket:
Socket PGA-604


Reviews, Questions about Intel Xeon MP BX80560KF2660F




Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Xeon MP BX80560KF2660F
 
  
      1+7= *


Popular today


Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
AMD Phenom II X4 Deneb 905e (AM3, L3 6144Kb)
AMD Phenom II X4 Deneb 905e (AM3, L3 6144Kb)
Socket: AM3; Kernel: Deneb; Number of cores: 4; Celeron: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2500 MHz; System bus: HT; A multiplication factor: 12.5; The voltage on the kernel: 0.825 B; Integrated memory controll...




news
 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 will be the company's first chip with a frequency above 4 GHz.

New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.



news
 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9000 processors turned out to be very powerful and very expensive

AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.



news
 Mobile Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX proved to be faster than its desktop counterpart

The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.