Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Tetracosa-core (24 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.20 GHz
Overclocking Speed:
3.40 GHz
QuickPath Interconnect:
9.60 GT/s
Direct Media Interface:
5 GT/s
L2 Cache:
6 MB
L3 Cache:
60 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
48
Processor Socket:
Socket R3 LGA-2011
Power Description Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Thermal Design Power:
165 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Thermal Specification:
174.2°F (79°C)
Dimensions Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Width:
1.8"
Depth:
2.1"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Xeon E7-8800 v4 CM8066902885200
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.