Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Quad-core (4 Core)
Clock Speed:
3 GHz
Overclocking Speed:
3.20 GHz
Direct Media Interface:
5 GT/s
L2 Cache:
1 MB
L3 Cache:
6 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
22 nm
Processor Socket:
Socket H3 LGA-1150
Display & Graphics Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
HD 4600
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Thermal Design Power:
84 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Thermal Specification:
162.9°F (72.7°C)
Dimensions Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core i5 i5-4400 BX80646I54430
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Beckton
Socket: LGA1567; Core: Beckton; Number of cores: 6; Process Technology: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2000 MHz; System bus: QPI; The multiplication factor: 15; The core voltage: 0.675 V; The amount of L2 ca...
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.