Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Quad-core (4 Core)
Clock Speed:
3.60 GHz
Overclocking Speed:
4.30 GHz
L3 Cache:
6 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
8
Processor Socket:
Socket LGA-1200
Processor Generation:
10th Gen
Display & Graphics Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
UHD Graphics 630
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Thermal Design Power:
65 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Thermal Specification:
212°F (100°C)
Dimensions Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core i3 CM8070104291317
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.