Intel Core M HE8066201930521 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core M HE8066201930521| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
900 MHz
Overclocking Speed:
2.20 GHz
L3 Cache:
4 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
4
Processor Socket:
Socket BGA-1515
Processor Generation:
6th Gen
Display & Graphics Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
HD Graphics 515
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Thermal Design Power:
4.50 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Thermal Specification:
212°F (100°C)
Dimensions Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Width:
0.8"
Depth:
0.6"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core M HE8066201930521
Popular today
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G 3.7 GHz Six-Core AM4 100-100000147BOX
CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 5 4600G; CPU Socket: AM4; Unlocked: Yes; Number of Cores: 6; Base Clock Speed: 3.7 GHz; Maximum Boost Speed: 4.2 GHz; Thermal Design Power (TDP): 65 W; Included Thermal Solution: ...
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.