Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
3.40 GHz
L3 Cache:
2 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Threads:
2
Processor Socket:
Socket LGA-1200
Display & Graphics Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
UHD Graphics 610
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Thermal Design Power:
58 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Thermal Specification:
212°F (100°C)
Dimensions Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Celeron G-Series CM8070104292110
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Beckton
Socket: LGA1567; Core: Beckton; Number of cores: 6; Process Technology: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2000 MHz; System bus: QPI; The multiplication factor: 15; The core voltage: 0.675 V; The amount of L2 ca...
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.