Intel Celeron CM8068403379312 specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Celeron CM8068403379312| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Technical Information Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Processor:
Intel
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.90 GHz
Direct Media Interface:
8 GT/s
L2 Cache:
512 KB
L3 Cache:
2 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
14 nm
Processor Socket:
Socket H4 LGA-1151
Display & Graphics Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Graphics Controller Manufacturer:
Intel
Graphics Controller Model:
UHD Graphics 610
Number of Monitors Supported:
3
Power Description Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Thermal Design Power:
35 W
Environmental Conditions Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Thermal Specification:
190.4°F (88°C)
Dimensions Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Width:
1.5"
Depth:
1.5"
Reviews, Questions about Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Celeron CM8068403379312
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.