Intel Xeon E5450 Quad-Core Harpertown 3.0 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Xeon E5450 Quad-Core Harpertown 3.0 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Detailed Specs Intel Xeon E5450 Quad-Core Harpertown 3.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
EU80574KJ080N
Model:
Intel Xeon Processor E5450
Core Name:
Harpertown
Number of cores:
4
Clock frequency:
3.0 GHz
L2 Cache:
12 MB
FSB Speed:
1333 MHz
Lithography:
45 nm
Socket:
LGA 771
Max Thermal Design Power:
80 W
Advanced Technologies:
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel 64 Architecture
Idle States
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Intel Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring Technology
Execute Disable Bit
Intel 64 Architecture
Idle States
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Intel Demand Based Switching
Thermal Monitoring Technology
Execute Disable Bit
Reviews, Questions about Intel Xeon E5450 Quad-Core Harpertown 3.0 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Xeon E5450 Quad-Core Harpertown 3.0 GHz
Popular today
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: OSA8220CRWOF; Brand Name: AMD; Product Line: Opteron; Product Model: 8220; Packaged Quantity: 1; Processor Manufacturer: AMD; Processor Core: Dual-core (2 Core); Clock Speed:...
Intel Xeon MP Beckton
Socket: LGA1567; Core: Beckton; Number of cores: 6; Process Technology: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2000 MHz; System bus: QPI; The multiplication factor: 15; The core voltage: 0.675 V; The amount of L2 ca...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.