Intel Xeon E5405 Quad-Core Harpertown 2.0 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Xeon E5405 Quad-Core Harpertown 2.0 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Detailed Specs Intel Xeon E5405 Quad-Core Harpertown 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
EU80574KJ041N, AT80574KJ041N
Model:
Intel Xeon Processor E5405
Core Name:
Harpertown
Number of cores:
4
Thread Count:
4
Clock frequency:
2.0 GHz
L2 Cache:
12 MB
FSB Speed:
1333 MHz
Lithography:
45 nm
Socket:
LGA771
Max Thermal Design Power:
80 W
Advanced Technologies:
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel 64 Architecture
Thermal Monitoring Technology
Execute Disable Bit
Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Intel 64 Architecture
Thermal Monitoring Technology
Execute Disable Bit
Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Reviews, Questions about Intel Xeon E5405 Quad-Core Harpertown 2.0 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Xeon E5405 Quad-Core Harpertown 2.0 GHz
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.