Intel Pentium Dual-Core G630 2.7 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Pentium Dual-Core G630 2.7 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Detailed Specs Intel Pentium Dual-Core G630 2.7 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
CM8062301046404
Model:
Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor G630
Number of cores:
2
Thread Count:
2
Clock frequency:
2.7 GHz
Intel Smart Cache:
3 MB
DMI:
5.0 GT/s
Lithography:
32 nm
Socket:
LGA 1155
Max Thermal Design Power:
65 W
Max Memory Bandwidth:
17.0 GB/s
Graphics Base Frequency:
850 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency:
1.1 GHz
Max CPU Configuration:
1
Advanced Technologies:
Intel Virtualization Technology(VT-x)
Intel 64 Architecture
Idle States
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Intel Fast Memory Access
Intel Flex Memory Access
Execute Disable Bit
Intel VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Reviews, Questions about Intel Pentium Dual-Core G630 2.7 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Pentium Dual-Core G630 2.7 GHz
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.