Intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 3.2 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 3.2 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Detailed Specs Intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 3.2 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
JM80547PG0882MM,HH80547PG0882MM
Model:
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 640
Core Name:
Prescott
Number of cores:
1
Clock frequency:
3.2 GHz
L2 Cache:
2 MB
FSB Speed:
800 MHz
Lithography:
90 nm
Socket:
LGA 775
Max Thermal Design Power:
84 W
Advanced Technologies:
Intel Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel 64 Architecture
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Execute Disable Bit
Intel 64 Architecture
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Execute Disable Bit
Reviews, Questions about Intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 3.2 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 3.2 GHz
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.