Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz) specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Kernel Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Kernel:
Yonah
Number of cores:
2
Celeron:
65 nm
Frequency characteristics Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Clock frequency:
1600 MHz
System bus:
533 MHz
A multiplication factor:
12
Cache Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
The amount of L1 cache:
64 KB
The amount of L2 cache:
2048 KB
Instruction sets Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Instructions:
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
Support for AMD64/EM64T:
no
Support NX Bit:
yes
Detailed Specs Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Typical heat dissipation:
31 W
Maximum operating temperature:
100 C
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core Duo T2050 (1600MHz, 2048Kb L2, 533MHz)
Popular today
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: OSA8220CRWOF; Brand Name: AMD; Product Line: Opteron; Product Model: 8220; Packaged Quantity: 1; Processor Manufacturer: AMD; Processor Core: Dual-core (2 Core); Clock Speed:...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.