Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield| Specifications | | | Reviews |
General Features
Socket:
LGA775
Core
Core:
Kentsfield
Number of cores:
4
Process Technology:
65 nm
The Frequency Characteristics
Clock frequency:
2667 MHz
System bus:
1066
The multiplication factor:
10
The core voltage:
1.372 V
Cache Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield
The amount of L1 cache:
64 KV
The amount of L2 cache:
8192 KV
Instruction Sets
Instructions:
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3
Support AMD64/EM64T:
Yes
Support NX Bit:
Yes
Support for Virtualization Technology:
Yes
Detailed Specs Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield
Typical heat:
130 W
Maximum operating temperature:
65
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition Kentsfield
Popular today
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 Quad-Core Haswell 3.6 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80646E31276V3; Model: Intel Xeon Processor E3-1276 v3; Core Name: Haswell; Number of cores: 4; Thread Count: 8; Clock frequency: 3.6 GHz; Max Turbo Frequency: 4.0 GHz; Cach...
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: OSA8220CRWOF; Brand Name: AMD; Product Line: Opteron; Product Model: 8220; Packaged Quantity: 1; Processor Manufacturer: AMD; Processor Core: Dual-core (2 Core); Clock Speed:...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.