Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Conroe 2.33 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> Intel >> Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Conroe 2.33 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Detailed Specs Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Conroe 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
HH80557PJ0534MG
Model:
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6550
Core Name:
Conroe
Number of cores:
2
Clock frequency:
2.33 GHz
L2 Cache:
4 MB
FSB Speed:
1333 MHz
Lithography:
65 nm
Socket:
LGA 775
Max Thermal Design Power:
65 W
Advanced Technologies:
Intel Virtualization Technology
Intel Trusted Execution Technology
Intel 64 Architecture
Idle States
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Execute Disable Bit
Intel Trusted Execution Technology
Intel 64 Architecture
Idle States
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
Execute Disable Bit
Reviews, Questions about Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Conroe 2.33 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 Conroe 2.33 GHz
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
Intel Core i5 i5-3400 SR0T8
Processor: Intel; Processor Core: Quad-core (4 Core); Clock Speed: 3.20 GHz; Direct Media Interface: 5 GT/s; L2 Cache: 1 MB; L3 Cache: 6 MB; 64-bit Processing: Yes; Process Technology: 22 nm; Processo...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.