AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> AMD >> AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
General Information AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
SMS3500HAX4CME
Brand Name:
AMD
Product Line:
Sempron
Product Model:
3500
Technical Information AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Processor Manufacturer:
AMD
Processor Core:
Single-core (1 Core)
Clock Speed:
1.80 GHz
HyperTransport Speed:
800 MHz
L1 Cache:
128 KB
L2 Cache:
512 KB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Processor Technology:
AMD64 Technology, HyperTransport Technology, AMD PowerNow! Technology
Processor Socket:
Socket S1 PGA-638
Power Description AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Thermal Design Power:
25 W
Miscellaneous AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Additional Information:
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Platform Supported:
PC
Environmentally Friendly:
Yes
Environmental Certification:
RoHS
Reviews, Questions about AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about AMD Sempron 3500 1.8 GHz
Popular today
AMD Opteron Dual-core 8220 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: OSA8220CRWOF; Brand Name: AMD; Product Line: Opteron; Product Model: 8220; Packaged Quantity: 1; Processor Manufacturer: AMD; Processor Core: Dual-core (2 Core); Clock Speed:...
Intel Xeon MP Beckton
Socket: LGA1567; Core: Beckton; Number of cores: 6; Process Technology: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2000 MHz; System bus: QPI; The multiplication factor: 15; The core voltage: 0.675 V; The amount of L2 ca...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.