AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> AMD >> AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
General Information AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
OSA8220GAA6CR
Brand Name:
AMD
Product Line:
Opteron
Product Model:
8220 SE
Technical Information AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz
Processor Manufacturer:
AMD
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.80 GHz
L1 Cache:
256 KB
L2 Cache:
2 MB
Process Technology:
90 nm
Processor Technology:
AMD64 Technology, Virtualization Technology, HyperTransport Technology, AMD PowerNow! Technology
Processor Socket:
Socket F LGA-1207
Miscellaneous AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz
Additional Information:
Quad-Core Upgradeability, Integrated Memory Controller, Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP),
Platform Supported:
PC
Reviews, Questions about AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about AMD Opteron Dual-Core 8220 SE 2.80 GHz
Popular today
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
Intel Core i5 i5-3400 SR0T8
Processor: Intel; Processor Core: Quad-core (4 Core); Clock Speed: 3.20 GHz; Direct Media Interface: 5 GT/s; L2 Cache: 1 MB; L3 Cache: 6 MB; 64-bit Processing: Yes; Process Technology: 22 nm; Processo...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.