AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> AMD >> AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
General Information AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
OSK275FAA6CBS
Brand Name:
AMD
Product Line:
Opteron
Product Model:
275HE
Technical Information AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Processor Manufacturer:
AMD
Processor Core:
Dual-core (2 Core)
Clock Speed:
2.20 GHz
HyperTransport Speed:
1000 MHz
L2 Cache:
4 MB
64-bit Processing:
Yes
Process Technology:
90 nm
Processor Technology:
AMD64 Technology, 3DNow! Professional
Processor Socket:
Socket PGA-940
Power Description AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Input Voltage:
1.3 V DC
Thermal Design Power:
95 W
Miscellaneous AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Platform Supported:
PC
Environmentally Friendly:
Yes
Environmental Certification:
RoHS
Reviews, Questions about AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about AMD Opteron Dual-Core 275HE 2.2 GHz
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 2.33 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: BX80557E6550; Brand Name: Intel; Product Line: Core 2 Duo; Product Model: E6550; Packaged Quantity: 1; Package Type: Retail; Processor Manufacturer: Intel; Processor Core: Du...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.