AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> AMD >> AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz| Specifications | | | Reviews |
General Information AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number:
OSB240FOT5BLE
Brand Name:
AMD
Product Line:
Opteron
Product Model:
240 EE
Packaged Quantity:
1
Technical Information AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz
Processor Manufacturer:
AMD
Processor Core:
Single-core (1 Core)
Clock Speed:
1.40 GHz
HyperTransport Speed:
1000 MHz
L1 Cache:
128 KB
L2 Cache:
1 MB
Processor Technology:
AMD64 Technology, Virtualization Technology, HyperTransport Technology, AMD PowerNow! Technology
Processor Socket:
Socket PGA-940
Miscellaneous AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz
Additional Information:
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Platform Supported:
PC
Reviews, Questions about AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz
Write Review / Ask a question about AMD Opteron 240 EE 1.40 GHz
Popular today
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G 3.7 GHz Six-Core AM4 100-100000147BOX
CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 5 4600G; CPU Socket: AM4; Unlocked: Yes; Number of Cores: 6; Base Clock Speed: 3.7 GHz; Maximum Boost Speed: 4.2 GHz; Thermal Design Power (TDP): 65 W; Included Thermal Solution: ...
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer Part Number: HH80557PG0412M; Model: Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E4400; Number of cores: 2; Clock frequency: 2.0 GHz; L2 Cache: 2 MB; FSB Speed: 800 MHz; Lithography: 65 nm; Socket: LGA 775...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.