AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2) specs.
CPU Processors Specs >> AMD >> AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)| Specifications | | | Reviews |
Basic Specs AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Socket:
FM2
Kernel AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Kernel:
Richland
Number of cores:
2
Celeron:
32 nm
Frequency characteristics AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Clock frequency:
4000 MHz
Integrated memory controller:
yes
Cache AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
The amount of L1 cache:
48 KB
The amount of L2 cache:
1024 KB
Instruction sets AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Instructions:
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4
Support for AMD64/EM64T:
yes
Support NX Bit:
yes
Support Virtualization Technology:
yes
Detailed Specs AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Typical heat dissipation:
65 W
Reviews, Questions about AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Write Review / Ask a question about AMD Athlon X2 370K Richland (FM2, 1024Kb L2)
Popular today
Intel Xeon MP Beckton
Socket: LGA1567; Core: Beckton; Number of cores: 6; Process Technology: 45 nm; Clock frequency: 2000 MHz; System bus: QPI; The multiplication factor: 15; The core voltage: 0.675 V; The amount of L2 ca...
Intel Xeon MP Gallatin
Socket: S604; Core: Gallatin; Number of cores: 1; Process Technology: 130 nm; Clock frequency: 3067 MHz; System bus: 533 MHz; The multiplication factor: 23; The core voltage: 1.525 V; The amount of L1...
New details about the upcoming MediaTek Dimensity 9500 flagship processor have appeared online. According to the latest information, the chip will have an increased frequency and will be on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 in terms of technical specifications.
AMD has announced the start date and prices of Threadripper PRO 9000 series processors. The list of new products includes five models with different specifications, which, as expected, will cost a decent amount of money.
The results of testing of Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX mobile chip have appeared in the network, which showed unexpected results in comparison with its ?big brother?. In the PassMark benchmark it outperformed its desktop version in terms of performance.